AI for Higher Education

AI is advancing quickly, and higher education can no longer treat it as a distant priority. Institutions are searching for practical ways to use these tools to strengthen digital experiences that influence enrollment and retention. Teams are finding that AI doesn’t replace human effort. It expands their capacity and creates interactions that feel more responsive and more personal.

Moving beyond the traditional Chatbot

These opportunities reach beyond the familiar chatbot that many campuses deployed years ago.

Instead of waiting for students to search for information, AI can guide them through the moments that often determine whether they apply or stay engaged. Georgia State’s Pounce system is a strong example. It sends reminders at the right time and answers questions through intelligent messaging. This steady support lowered “Summer Melt” and helped more students arrive prepared for the fall.

Early intervention systems show what’s possible

Earlier efforts in student success revealed how powerful timely intervention can be. Course Signals offered one of the first demonstrations of this idea. It combined analytics with behavioral and demographic indicators and also drew from engagement patterns in the Blackboard platform. The system identified students who might be at risk so instructors could step in sooner and offer support. Institutions that used it saw improved outcomes and stronger retention, which confirmed how valuable early insight can be.

Preparing for AI-driven search expectations

This type of guidance points to a broader future for AI in higher education. As conversational search becomes normal, students expect tools that understand intent and provide information that feels immediate. To appear accurately in platforms like ChatGPT, institutions need public information that AI can interpret without confusion. Program pages that follow a clear structure, admissions details that are easy to understand, and language that stays consistent across departments all help AI represent the institution with accuracy and nuance.

Personalization as an emerging baseline

Personalization is becoming a baseline expectation. AI makes this far more feasible for teams that can’t expand their staff. Institutions can align content with a student’s goals and connect them with resources that match their interests. Tools like UCF’s Knightbot reveal how AI can reduce friction by responding to real interaction data rather than guesswork. Early retention systems follow a similar pattern. They watch for changes in engagement so staff can step in before challenges escalate. These insights help instructors understand where timely support can keep students on track.

Finding and fixing digital friction

AI also exposes friction within the digital journey. Click patterns and content engagement show where prospective students pause or continue. This visibility makes it easier to strengthen the moments that influence decisions. When UX, content strategy, and discovery data function together, institutions create more effective experiences without adding staff. The digital space becomes a partner in recruitment and retention and gives human teams more time for meaningful work.

Responsible use and the path forward

As AI becomes more common, leaders are raising essential questions about responsible use. They want clarity around data practices and open reasoning behind AI recommendations. They also want limits that protect human judgment. These questions reflect a move toward deliberate adoption rather than rapid experimentation. When used with care, AI can strengthen relationships, remove hidden barriers, and support students from their first inquiry through graduation in ways that align with each institution’s mission.

AI and Web Accessibility: Help or Hype?

Web accessibility ensures that everyone – regardless of ability – can use and benefit from your website. For some users, that means being able to navigate a site using a keyboard or screen reader. For others. It means understanding content despite vision, hearing, or cognitive challenges. It’s not just good practice; it’s increasingly required by law. And it opens your digital doors to a wider audience. 

AI is creeping into every part of digital life, including accessibility. But does it help make websites more inclusive? Or is it just another shiny tool that creates more problems than it solves?

Here’s a quick take on how AI can support accessibility, and where it might do more harm than good.

Where AI Helps

  • Auto-generated alt text. AI can analyze images and suggest descriptions, filling in gaps when content editors forget. It’s convenient on large, content-heavy sites, but human review is still essential. AI may “see” a mountain, but it won’t know why the image matters in context.
  • Real-time content feedback. Some platforms now offer accessibility checks directly in the content editing workflow. These tools help flag issues like missing headings, poor color contrast, or unlabeled buttons as content is created, making accessibility more achievable for teams without deep technical skills.
  • Conversational interfaces. AI-powered chat and voice tools can improve navigation and usability for people with mobility or vision challenges. For example, a WordPress site might integrate a voice-driven search that helps users find content without typing, while a Drupal site might use AI to guide users through complex forms using natural language cues.
  • Video and audio transcription. AI-generated transcripts and captions can make multimedia content instantly more accessible. Think about a site with hundreds of podcast episodes or instructional videos — AI can drastically reduce the time and cost of providing accessible alternatives while still allowing for human review to ensure accuracy.

Where AI Hurts

  • “One-line” accessibility overlays. These scripts promise to make your site instantly accessible. In reality, they rarely fix the underlying code and can interfere with screen readers and keyboard navigation. Worse, they give a false sense of compliance and have even led to lawsuits. Learn more about overlays.
  • Poor language translation. AI-powered translation tools can be helpful, but they often miss nuances, idioms, or culturally sensitive phrasing. A poorly translated error message or form instructions can confuse users who rely on clear, simple language.
  • Voice recognition limitations. AI-powered voice navigation tools can struggle with users who have speech impairments, strong accents or use assistive speech devices.
  • AI bias. Because AI is trained on existing data, it can reflect biases or overlook the needs of users with disabilities. What seems “smart” might miss key accessibility issues entirely.

The Bottom Line

AI can support accessibility, but it’s not a substitute for doing it right. The best results come from using AI as a helper to flag issues early, reduce manual effort, and support your team. But it still takes real people, clear standards, and smart design decisions to build truly inclusive websites.

Kanopi writes a lot about accessibility. Check out our dedicated page.